2022 Nordica Enforcer 94 Skis

SKU
0A130800
As low as $559.99 Regular Price $800.00
In stock

Nordica Enforcer 94 Skis

Any turn, any condition, at any time. That's really the best way to sum up the abilities and capabilities of the Nordica Enforcer 94 skis. These things are built with high-performance versatility in mind, and they succeed in almost all endeavors. We talk a lot about the mid-90's and their ability to cover all the bases in the ski world, and at the top of that class stands the Nordica Enforcer 94. Thanks to the shape, profile, and construction, the Nordica Enforcer 94 is one of the most well-rounded skis we've seen to come through our doors. On our feet, they live up to the hype. Thanks to the traditional Enforcer styling, the skis have that mid-range 94 mm underfoot width, and this is ideal for pretty much anything you'll encounter out there on the hill. You simply have to leave these skis in your car or on your rack and never have to think about whether you've got the right sticks or not. Same goes for travelers who agonize over what skis to bring on a trip. With the Nordica Enforcer 94, you're covered. East or west, north or south, these skis bring it wherever you bring them. Built with a wood core and two sheets of metal, these skis are as quick as they are damp, and as stable as they are smooth. Width-appropriate taper and rocker make them supreme floaters in the fresh snow, and they love to adventure and explore with the best of them. Skiers looking for the ultimate in versatility should look no further than the Nordica Enforcer 94.

Features:

  • Sidecut: 127/94/115 mm at 179 cm length
  • Turn Radius: 17.1 meters at 179 cm length
  • Wood Core
  • Dual Metal Laminate
  • Carbon Chassis
  • True Tip
  • Weight: 4030 Grams per Pair
  • Ability Level: Advanced and Expert Skiers

Ability Level:

Preferred Terrain
 All-Mountain •  Groomers •  Powder 

All-Mountain
Groomers
Powder

Rocker Profile

2022 Nordica Enforcer 94 Skis

Learn More

2022 Ski Test
We've tested the 2022 Nordica Enforcer 94 as part of our 2022 Ski Test. Click the link to see our full profile.
Chairlift Chat
We've discussed this ski on Chairlift Chat. Click the link to check it out.
6'1" tall. 170 pounds. east coast skier. green to black. advanced. like morning groomers for charging, carving. also becoming more interested in loose conditions, moguls, more variety. Reentered skiing back in 2014 after many years carving it up on a race board (snowboard). Currently on Volkl RTM 81s, 171cm. Looking for something more playful, crud, loose snow, moguls, but still good turner. was looking at enforcers vs rustlers? Thoughts, other recs? Length recommendations too? Thanks. Been soaking up the info on your site.
Question by: jack on Feb 23, 2021, 1:59 AM
HI Jack!
Rustlers are more playful than Enforcers, so if that's a big priority for you, I'd lean that way. They're still great turners, not quite the dampness and stability of the Enforcer, but they're lighter! I think the Rustler 9 in the 180 will be a great choice. Fischer Ranger 94 FR is also worth a look. Have fun!
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Feb 23, 2021, 9:04 PM
I'm currently on narrow full camber skis, 167cm, and they feel right lengthwise. Would the 172s be a good match for me, given the rocker profile? Or would they feel too long? I'm 5'6" 150lbs expert skier.
Question by: Bryan on Sep 15, 2021, 9:52 PM
Hi Bryan,

You could go with the 172cm ski and feel great on it. Super fun ski. Enjoy it.
Answer by: Mark Van Liere on Sep 16, 2021, 12:13 PM
I'm an advanced/expert 50/50 on-piste/off-piste west coast skier. I'm 5'5" and 160lbs. Love skiing everything on the mtn, from fast groomers, to steeps and bumps. What would be the better ski, Enforcer 94, Enforcer 100, or Vokl M6 ? Would 172 be the best size for me ?
Question by: David on Nov 1, 2021, 10:16 PM
Hi David,
I would go with the enforcer 100, the 100mm waist width will give more float in deeper snow and plow through the crud a lot better. The enforcers also have a lot more rocker than the Mantra so this makes them easier to turn through the trees and moguls. The mantras would give you a bit more stability and edge hold on harder packed snow but you would have to work harder to make tighter turns through trees and moguls. With all the rocker in the enforcers they ski a little shorter than they look but that 172cm option would be right in your range.
Thanks,
SE
Answer by: Eric Eric McDonough on Nov 2, 2021, 2:57 PM
Is the design and construction the same for the 2021 Nordica enforcer 94 and the 2022 model ?
Question by: Tim larsen on Feb 6, 2021, 6:49 PM
Yes, same construction just new updated (sweet) topsheets!
Answer by: Josh Wolfgang on Feb 6, 2021, 8:36 PM
Hi Ski Essentials, I am 36 yo, 5’8”, 170 lbs, advanced expert skier. i ski solely east coast, Ny and VT. I currently ski a 168 Laser AX. My style is athletic with a focus on carving. I am looking for a second ski to add to my wall. I want a fatter, crud buster that can also handle small amounts of fresh snow and carve well for its class. I have zeroed in on the mantra m6, enforcer 94, and storm rider 95. Length would be low to mid 170s depending on model. Do you have any thoughts? Thanks! Steve
Question by: Steven on Feb 4, 2022, 8:26 AM
Hi Steven,

If you are already a Stockli fan, its really hard to steer you away from another Stockli, especially the SR 95. The absolute pinnacle of its class and the best all-mountain ski out there in the mid-90s waist width, bar none. There is simply nothing the ski does not excel in except for the deepest powder. AS you are already aware, you notice a difference in Stockli on the very first turn.

Have fun!

SE


Answer by: Dave Hatoff on Feb 4, 2022, 10:54 AM
I'm 6'1 205 , advanced level skier , trying to decide between the E94 - E100 or Mantra M6 all in 185ish size. Live in PA but usually ski in VT or upstate NY but typically in LCC for a few weeks every winter , primarily like trees - off piste- bumps but with skiing more w the young kids and being limited on storm chasing from work and school, spending more time on groomed and firm conditions than I used to. I also have a bigger 115 underfoot ski for deeper days, but still need a versatile ski here since I'm rarely ever just skiing groomed unless no other option and would probably use this 75-80% of the time. But still need great edgehold since I'm forced to spend more time on the local icy PA hills these days also. Have a Nordica Hell and Back 185 for this spot right now. Thanks!
Question by: Ben on Mar 4, 2022, 10:48 AM
Hi Ben!
The Enforcer 94 is a nice replacement for that Hell and Back (which I loved). Enforcer is a bit heavier and stronger, but is super-grippy and stable. I think you'll love the edge control of the ski for sure. I'd say 186 is a good choice for sure.
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Mar 4, 2022, 11:42 AM
I am 5’8” and 175 lbs, I generally ski on a pair of K2 Sidestashs 175 cm or Rosignol Soul seven 180 cm skis. I am 80 and find anymore I prefer to ski a little slower than the younger guys but can keep up with them if I want to. This year we have had more icy conditions at my ski are so I have been thinking of getting a better carving ski. I have considered Mantra m6 and also the Nordic’s Enforcer 94 in a 179 cm length. Your thought please
Question by: Bill Calhoun on Mar 1, 2022, 7:59 PM
HI Bill!
The Enforcer is a bit heavier than the M6, but is a bit friendlier for an all-mountain ski. The M6 is powerful and precise, and that's about it, while the Enforcer 94 has more of an all-mountain personality to it. If you're looking for a bit easier of a time, I'd look to the 172 in the Enforcer 94--it's a stable ski so you don't have to size up on it. If you prefer longer skis, don't let me talk you out of it, though.
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Mar 2, 2022, 5:04 PM
I'm torn between Stormrider 95 vs. Nordica Enforcer 94 for Idaho/Washington skiing (350 inches per year on the mountain), mostly on piste, fast groomers and slow through the moguls. Venturing into the trees a little more now. Is one more forgiving of my backseat moments? Better at hardpack? I'm 5'9", 170 lbs, upper intermediate skill level. Thank you!
Question by: Benjamin Adkins on Feb 4, 2022, 11:41 PM
Hi Benjamin!
Kind of a toss up for backseat adventures. While the Stockli is more flexible in the tail, the Enforcer's more freeride-ish shape, rocker, and taper make it less hooky. I'd say the Stockli comes around nicer in a carved turn on hard pack for those same reasons. I'd rather ski the Stockli in the bumps, mostly for weight-savings, but it's pretty close. The precision and quality of the Stockli stands out for me, though. I'd say 172 in Nordica or 175 in Stockli. Have fun!
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Feb 7, 2022, 12:43 PM
I'm looking at Enforcer / Soul Rider and M6 Mantra as an intermediate all mountain ski. I ski west coast and like to do a little bit of everything. But I am worried the enforcer might be too much yet I am very athletic (5'11", 170 lbs). Haven't skied in a few years. Really just want a new ski I can play on and go exploring without feeling like the ski is too much. Any thoughts a appreciated.
Question by: Joe on Dec 5, 2021, 2:46 PM
Hello Joe,

Your intuition is correct- The Enforcer is by the far the stiffest option out of the three ski you listed. The Mantra M6 would lie in the middle of three with also having metal in its construction, just as not as much as the Enforcer. The Soul Rider is a much different ski that the others, being an all-mountain, directional twin tip with no metal in it. (Wood and carbon make up its construction) All are extremely capable, one ski quivers for all-mountain. But the edge goes to the Mantra M6 which gives you the best of all worlds without being too stiff or too soft, sits right in the middle of three and really has no weaknesses in any snow or any terrain. A SE tester favorite.


Hope this helps and think snow!

SE
Answer by: Dave Hatoff on Dec 6, 2021, 9:36 AM
are there any changes to the Enforcer 94 from 2021 to 2022?
Question by: Scott on Sep 10, 2021, 9:08 PM
Hi Scott,

No new changes, except for the top sheet. Great ski.

Thanks,

Mark
Answer by: Mark Van Liere on Sep 13, 2021, 9:39 AM
Hi,

i am eyeballing this model as an addition to my powder ski's.
The question offcourse is which size to get... My height is 6'0 and
on a good day my weight is around 172 lbs. The skilevel is more to
the experienced side and i love agresive skiing all over the mountain.
Would the 179 of 186 suit me better?
Cheers for the advice!
Question by: Thomas on Jan 20, 2022, 8:38 AM
Hi Thomas!
I would say the 179 is a better choice for you in that ski. It's pretty darn stable so I think it's okay to go just under head-high for sure. The 186 would probably be a handful in tighter spots. Have fun!
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Jan 20, 2022, 9:28 AM
I am torn between Enforcer 94 and Soul Rider 97.
Both seem to be good choice for one quiver ski judging from expert reviews.
My dillema is sizing. Enforcer 94 come at 179 or 186 and i think one would be too short while the otjer too long for an agressive, groomers, trees, chutes... all mountain but moguls 185lb 6foot tall skier.
Soul rider 97 comesnin at 185 which rocker type considered is close to my size.

Any opinions on the 94 sizing?

Question by: Mimo on Nov 27, 2021, 4:46 PM
Hi, Both of the skis are going to give you different things, the Enforcer is a great front side, aggressive groomer/carving ski while the Soul Rider has a little more play in the tails of the ski, allowing for easier skiing in the woods and bumps. Since the Enforcer is a little more aggressive, I would recommend the 179 length but if you plan to stay on trail most of the time you could jump up to the 186 but it might be a little long if you going in the woods and bumps. The soul rider has more rocker meaning it will ski a little shorter so the 185 would be a great choice.
Hope this helps, let us know if you have any more questions.
Answer by: Alli R on Nov 28, 2021, 11:17 AM
Currently on the Enforcer 93. Love carving on the 93. Demoed the Rustler 9 on final day of last season, loved it, but was in the trees and bumps all day. Is there a noticeable skiing difference between the old 93 and the 94 in tight areas (trees and bumps)? Also curios what ski you think fits in the middle between the Enforcer 94 and Rustler 9?
Question by: Rob on Nov 11, 2021, 11:38 PM
Hi Rob,

There is no noticeable difference between the 20020 and 2021 Rustler 9 other than graphics. Exact same shape, dimensions and build. Still very approachable, responsive, and quick turning in bumps and tight trees.

As far as another ski that fits in the middle, we would Volkl Blaze 94- softer flex, similar performance, not as much metal and much lighter weight. But doesn't have quite the hard snow chops as the Blizzard and Nordica.

Hope this helps and think snow!

SE
Answer by: Dave Hatoff on Nov 12, 2021, 9:15 AM
Hi team,
Love the website, incredibly helpful reviews. I am looking for a new resort ski. I’ve been skiing for 8 years, will ski anything and love to be in the woods. I currently use the armada tracer 98s as a one ski quiver including back country (with a shift binding). I love taking this ski into the woods on resort days, but am looking for something considerably more stable through groomers/through crud but will still allow me to get into the woods and have a relatively good time (if I know it’s going to be a full day in the woods I’ll just use my tracers). I am in-between the Enforcer 94s and Maverick 95s, but open to suggestions. I also looked at the M6 Mantras, but reviews make it seem that it might be too much ski for me. Would love your thoughts on which ski, and which length. I’m 5’ 10’’ 170 lbs, athletic build and on the 172 tracer right now, which feels right for the woods/touring. Thanks. Ben
Question by: Benjamin Depo on Feb 7, 2022, 9:37 AM
Thanks, Ben!
The weight is the big difference between Enforcer/Mantra and Maverick. I put Enforcer and Mantra in similar range in terms of application, with the Enforcer just being a bit more friendly due to the more freeride-y shape. Maverick delivers amazing carving performance, stability, and energy, but with a much lighter weight. If you're looking for something with endless stability through all types of conditions, I'd go Enforcer, but for more maneuverability, the Maverick is fantastic. The Enforcer is more of a split from your Tracer, so that's something to consider as well, in a good way. I'd go 172 in Enforcer 94 as well. Have fun!
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Feb 14, 2022, 1:05 PM
Hi Team, thanks for all the inside you are providing. I just tested the Enforcer 88 and loved it. Deciding to buy 94 though to have more versatility :) and my question comes to size - I am 210 Ibs and 5'11'' - intermediate / advance skier - and I am torn between 179 and 186 - what would you recommend for me? On the 88 I tested 186 and didn't have a problem but also no chance to make a comparison with 179. Thanks m
Question by: Mario on Feb 20, 2022, 7:38 AM
HI Mario!
The main thing you'll notice about the 179 is a slightly tighter arc. If you are looking to make the ski a bit turnier, I'd go 179, but since you didn't have an issue with the 186, I'm not going to talk you out of a longer ski. Since it's a stable ski, though, you do not have to add cm to gain performance, making me lean to the 179.
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Feb 21, 2022, 8:33 AM
Hello! Intermediate to low level advance skier mainly skiing west coast groomers on blues and low level blacks. Getting better at edge to edge and want something I can get better on. Tried the enforcer 94 in a 172 and loved them but worried they might be a tad long? I'm 5'6.5 150lb male, would like to make it to 30-35mph+ with stability and be able to continue improving my carving. Should I stick with the 172 or get the 165?
Question by: Adam on Feb 27, 2022, 12:47 AM
HI Adam!
Yeah, I'd go 165. I think the innate stability and power of the ski allows you to go with the shorter length, and you get the benefit of the shorter arc as well, so they become better carvers as well as being more maneuverable for off-piste activities. Have fun!
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Feb 28, 2022, 11:29 AM
6’0”and 190, aggressive advance/expert level. I love the woods, bumps and steeps but spend time on the groomers with my better half. Any size suggestion?
Question by: Bob Brown on Mar 3, 2021, 10:50 AM
HI Bob!
I think 186 is the way to go in that ski. Have fun!
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Mar 4, 2021, 10:39 AM
Looking at the enforcer 94, the mantra6, and the blizzard rustler for 75% of the time. Have a powder ski for other days. I’m 6’ 1” 185-190 lbs and like to ski fast and looking for all purpose ski for days on groomers with my kids, for crud, low end powder, and trees. What do you recommend and what size?

Question by: Matt Dzurec on Mar 7, 2022, 9:43 PM
HI Matt!
The Rustler is the easiest and most playful while the Mantra is the most precise and demanding. The Enforcer 94 lies somewhere in the middle. I do think that the Rustler has a better range, so great for speed as well as crud, powder and woods. For a balance of all things, go Rustler, but for more performance without total demand, I think Enforcer 94 makes good sense there. I'd go 179 or 180 in either ski. Have fun!
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Mar 8, 2022, 8:00 AM
Intermediate skier doing mostly on piste sking out west. 5"11 245lbs. would you recommend the 94 enforcer or 94/104 enforcer unlimited? I was thinking 179cm.
Question by: Juan Rojas on Mar 23, 2022, 12:41 PM
Hi Juan!
I would stick to regular Enforcer, and go 94 if you're mostly on-piste. 179 sounds good to me!
SE
Answer by: SkiEssentials Expert on Mar 23, 2022, 4:14 PM
Hello! I am getting my bf his first pair of skis (bye rentals) and am down to 2 choices for a nice stiff ski:
Nordica Enforcer 94
Atomic Maverick 88Ti
He is intermediate-advanced, ripping down groomers, and has made great progress in moguls but is ready to advance to the next level. I'm leaning towards the Enforcers because it will be wider underfoot and will help him gain confidence in charging through crud and powder. On the other hand, he is very hesitant in glades/trees and might benefit from some more maneuverability there to gain confidence, so maybe the Mavericks?
For a ski that he can grow into over the next 5-8 years and become an advanced-expert skier in, which might you lean towards? He is ~185lbs and is working on his leg strength. FWIW I just got myself some Santa Ana 98s. We love a stiff ski.
Question by: Zoe on Apr 21, 2022, 5:41 PM
Hi Zoe!

If you're looking for a stiff heavy ski the Enforcer certainly fits the build. They're definitely difficult to maneuver at slower speeds due to the weight and flatter tail. But get them up to speed on a groomer and they really come alive. however, If he was looking to get into woods and bump skiing the Maverick might be the better ski here. Its much lighter and has a more forgiving tip and tail profile making it more maneuverable. You still get a dual metal laminate for edge hold and power, but the metal is thinner to save on weight. I would say for maximum attack and speed you should go with the Enforcer. For Maneuverability in bumps, trees, and off- piste, the Maverick will be the way to go.

SE
Answer by: Chris McClelland on Apr 22, 2022, 10:04 AM

Product Questions

Write Your Own Review
Write a Review for the 2022 Nordica Enforcer 94 Skis
Rating: