2022 Atomic Maverick 100 Ti
With the precision of a Porsche and the power of a locomotive, the Atomic Maverick 100 Ti is poised and ready to satisfy the needs of the most demanding of advanced and expert skiers. As the replacement line to the Vantage models from years past, the Maverick line is comprehensive and complete, with this 100 Ti serving as the flagship model. They really packed a lot of thought and technology into these skis, and it all seems like it works well together. Built with a poplar wood core, Atomic adds two .4 mm titanal sheets to the top and bottom, with a fiberglass laminate to add snap and energy. For the shape, Atomic uses that wider platform to generate float, all the while keeping it playful enough, especially in the shovel, for use in fresh and softer snow. In addition, the HRZN technology that has traditionally been used in Atomic’s powder, freestyle, and backcountry skis now filters into all Maverick (and women’s Maven) line skis, giving the added boost in the powder, without any sacrifice to the on-trail performance. Our staff had some pretty fair shakes on this ski throughout the winter, and our testers loved the performance of the ski on test day as well, and we’re pretty convinced that these new Mavericks are a nice upgrade from the outgoing Vantages—they're more playful while still retaining a very high-level of carving prowess, even at 100 mm wide.

ROCKER PROFILE

Rocker / Camber / Rocker
CORE MATERIALS


HRZN Tips, World Cup Base Finish
PREFERRED TERRAIN



All Mountain, Groomers, Big Mountain
We had two testers on the 180 and two on the 188 cm lengths, so we’ll start with the shorter length. Both Sam Freund and Jeff Neagle skied the 180 and both found it skied true to size and a good length for them. Sam was all 4’s and 5’s on his scorecard, with 5’s given for versatility and stability, and 4’s for all other categories, including quickness, maneuverability, and overall impression. I like to point out the 4 for quickness, as it is a pretty burly and wide ski, so it’s nice to see a high score for that category as well. Sam notes that the Maverick 100 is a “great one-ski quiver ski right here. Not lighting fast in tight spaces, but out on the trail, it tackled everything with ease. Super versatile, really enjoyed it. Reminded me a lot of the Bent Chetler 100, with a little more front side stability.” We see a lot of shaping similarities between not only the BC 100, but also the Atomic Backland 100, just with a beefier build for sure. Jeff Neagle skied the Maverick earlier in the season for a number of days, and did get more wintry and appropriate testing conditions, so his experience was slightly different than the rest of our testers who only got to ski it in spring-like snow. Even so, Jeff’s scores were very similar to Sam’s, with 4’s across the board with a lone exception for a 5 in versatility. Jeff notes that the Maverick 100 Ti is a “really good addition to the ~100 mm all-mountain ski category and definitely has its own feel and its own little niche. Lightweight, but strong too. Feels quite a bit lighter on your feet than a lot of skis in this width range with metal, which I think a lot of skiers will enjoy. Crosses over between groomed slopes and off-piste, softer snow conditions effortlessly. Its agile and quick when you want it to be, but strong and stable when you need it to be. Using HRZN Tech in the tip really helps give it a smoother feel than a lot of skis in deeper snow too. Helps boost float and keeps the ski planing, which I like. It's interesting that Atomic has 3 skis that are 100 mm underfoot. Backland 100, Bent Chetler 100, and now Maverick 100 Ti. The Maverick is hands down the most powerful and most precise out of that group, but retains some of the Atomic feel and attitude. I think it will be a favorite among skiers who have enjoyed skis like the Bent Chetler, but want a little more stability, edge grip, etc.”
On the 188, Andrew Ruschp and Mike Anglin certainly found the Maverick 100 a ski to be reckoned with. Andrew notes that he would go down to the 180 for eastern skiing, and as expected, his scores reflect that statemen. He scored the ski 5’s out of 5 for flotation, torsional stiffness, edge hold, and stability—all high scores that reflect a stiffer and longer ski. On the other hand, 2’s were found on his card for quickness, maneuverability, versatility, and forgiveness. These all line up as well with a ski being too long, especially for its build. Even though he’s a very strong skier, Andrew notes that the Maverick 100 Ti in the 188 was “a lotta ski. Would be great for deep days but way too much for me. Felt like I had 2x4s on my feet.” And that’s fair! Mike Anglin had similar scores of 5 out of 5 as Andrew in stability, torsional stiffness, and edge hold, and a similar 2 in forgiveness. Mike notes that he was “trying to stay away from the Top Gun 'Maverick' references but I can't. Absolute F14 fighter jet. Not as nimble as the jet but, can definitely reach Mach speed velocity and be comfy once there. Found it very stiff, and incredibly damp but able to comfortably link GS/SG radius turns in deep spring mashed corn. Short turns and bumps require some extra focus as it's easy to get thrown back. Not scared of any terrain but shines in deep snow and wide spaces. Best for aggressive expert skiers, who 'feel the need for speed' in the deep.”
As the flagship model, this Maverick 100 Ti loves to be put to the test. From steeps and trees to bumps and groomers, the burly Maverick does perform better with a skilled pilot who enjoys pushing a ski. It’s not terribly relaxing or easy-going, but that’s part of the fun. It still does have some of the light weight maneuverability that the Vantage had, but with a new level of stability and power.

Hi, could you compare Maverick 100 180 to the Enforcer 100 179 off piste? I know the Enforcer is heavier. There’s also the Enforcer 104…
I’m close in size to your man Jeff N. and mostly ski in Tahoe. Want something versatile for getting more into glades, leftover powder, and some bumps. I’m an expert long-time skier but not real aggressive on speed/risk.
Bent Chetler 100 (180) and QST 98 184cm are also on my list and from your comments BC100 might be best. But my trees aren’t super tight and I’ll be pretty directional.
Thanks, love the site
HI Daniel!
The Maverick is snappier and more energetic than the stout and stable Enforcer. I’d rather ski the Enforcer on a deep day, as I’ve found it to float quite well, and I’ll say the same about the 104. On-trail, the Maverick feels a lot narrower and nimbler than the width and build let on, and that’s a good thing. The BC100 and QST 98 are way more user-friendly, but don’t have the top end of the other two skis. Do you want that top end? If so, I’d stick to the Enforcer, but for a bit less of a commitment, go with the QST 98 for a well-rounded ripper of a ski. Have fun!
SE
Hey! I am looking for a quiver of 1 ski and I live in Jackson Hole. I do a lot of skiing with my kids (cruising groomers) but also want something that floats well when I can sneak out alone. I think I have narrowed my search down to the Atomic Maverick 100ti or the Elan Ripsticks Black Edition (96 or 106). I have demo’s all over f them and feel one I can’t lose, but wondering if you guys had a strong preference?
I’m seriously interested in the BC100 as my do-it-all sticks mounted with some shifts based on what I’ve read. My only concern is that I’m an easy 240lbs kitted up in the resort, and easily over 250 when earning my turns with my pack and everything. Would the mavericks be a good choice given my more advanced size? Or do you think the BC100 would still work for me? I’m off in the woods or doing sidecountry at least 75% of the time and live in new england.
HI Paul!
As long as you’re not expecting strong groomer performance, I’d lean to the Bent Chetler 100, since it sounds like your main focus in in softer snow and more playful skiing. I’m 225 pounds and have the BC 100 for soft snow and trees, and they’re fantastic.
SE