2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Model Year	Product Page	Ski Test Results	Chairlift Chat
2027	2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis—Skis with bindings	2026 K2 Reckoner 102 2027 K2 Reckoner 102	—
2025	2025 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis—Skis with bindings	2025 K2 Reckoner 102	—
2024	2024 K2 Reckoner 102 Ski—Skis with bindings	2024 K2 Reckoner 102	—
2023	2023 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis—Skis with bindings	—	2021 K2 RECKONER 102 SKI REVIEW

tester:

Ashley Maxfield

Ability: I'm A Pro
Height: 5'2"
Weight: 145
Days / Year: 120+
Age: 40
Years Skiing: 39

Ex racer/ retired FWT athlete

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

177 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Stowe, gondola groomers, loose granular, dust on crust.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

The ski feels true to size. I would ski this size.

Scores

Floatation:8/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:8/10

Playfulness:9/10

Forgiveness:9/10

Edge Grip:7/10

Versatility:8/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Super playful ski you can rock everywhere from groomers to the park to the trees. It was super fun to ski.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

All mountain freerider you can take into the park. It's playfulness lends itself to having fun wherever you ski it.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Intermediate to expert skiers will have fun on this ski. The higher level you are the more you will get out the playfulness.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

Fell in love with this ski during the 2026 ski testing and I feel the same way about them.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Jamie Morris

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'10"
Weight: 175
Days / Year: 60
Age: 48
Years Skiing: 43

Fast and smooth

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

184 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Stowe gondola, variable and a bit firm.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

This ski felt true to size. I liked the 184 for me.

Scores

Floatation:7/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:7/10

Playfulness:8/10

Forgiveness:7/10

Edge Grip:7/10

Versatility:7/10

Overall:7/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

The Reckoner was super playful and fun.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

These skis can ski the whole mountain from park to pow.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Advanced intermediate to a mellow expert.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

The twin tip definitely allows to ski to be skied a bit longer.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Collin Wiedersheim

Ability: Advanced
Height: 5'9"
Weight: 185
Days / Year: 40 days
Age: 31
Years Skiing: 8 Years

Calculated, Flowy, Smooth, Fast, & Fun.

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

184 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Groomers, side hits.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

Length felt just right. I would size down to the 177 for myself to enhance the agility and bring the weight down a bit.

Scores

Floatation:7/10

Stability:4/10

Quickness:8/10

Playfulness:10/10

Forgiveness:8/10

Edge Grip:3/10

Versatility:6/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Has to be one of the softest skis on the market. Incredibly supple and bendy, quite dense and heavy as well.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

Trees, park, and side hits galore. This ski is made to be jibby and creative, so soft and creative terrain are a must.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Advanced and up should consider a Reckoner 102. You also should be looking for a soft ski, there’s no escaping the flex pattern here.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

The Reckoner 102 is a soft and playful ski taken to the highest level. Don’t expect the ski to keep you upright, because it will keep bending and bending. For the record, that is not a bad thing whatsoever. It is a blast to ski through soft snow and features all around the mountain. I never thought I would enjoy a Reckoner, let alone this much. I hope to ski one again in the 177.

Read the Full Ski Test →

Jeff submitted 3 test cards — select one:

tester:

Jeff Neagle

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'10"
Weight: 165
Days / Year: 120-140
Age: 40
Years Skiing: 38

Flowing and Kind of Fast with Freestyle/Freeski Influence

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

177 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Stowe, mostly packed powder groomers with some fresh snow on ungroomed trails. Some park skiing too.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

It skis true to size in my opinion, you just have to understand it's a soft flexing twin tip with rocker. If you're not used to that, it might feel short.

Scores

Floatation:8/10

Stability:6/10

Quickness:9/10

Playfulness:10/10

Forgiveness:9/10

Edge Grip:6/10

Versatility:9/10

Overall:10/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

The Reckoner 102 isn't for everyone, but I always have so much fun skiing it. The 177 cm length has turned into my favorite park ski, although there are some new contenders for 2027 that come close. As a freeride ski, or especially if I lived out west, I would go 184 for sure, but the 177 is so fun around here. The flex and shape works great in soft snow, but it is a more centered mount point so you need to be used to some amount of ski behind you. There's also a surprising amount of torsional stiffness and grip in this ski, but it's a soft longitudinal flex, so it's not going to just rail carving turns. In the park, it's soft and fun and ultra forgiving, which for me, now that I'm 40 years old, is really, really nice to have. Bouncy, soft, playful, easy to flick around, and a blast in the park.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

You can ski it just about anywhere and even in some deeper snow, but the highlight for me is definitely its feel in the park and when you're skiing playful, fun terrain with fresh snow. Surprisingly fun to lay over carves on groomers, but when I own a Reckoner 102 I end up sliding a lot of rails, so that goes away eventually.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

It's perfectly fine for an intermediate as it's soft and has a lot of rocker, so comes with a ton of forgiveness. Could actually be a good option for a powder ski for someone still learning. Advanced and expert level skiers, especially park skiers, will be able to get it to do some crazy things. Super easy for butters because of the flex.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

The graphic carries over from 2026 to 2027, just FYI.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Jeff Neagle

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'10"
Weight: 165
Days / Year: 120-140
Age: 40
Years Skiing: 38

Flowing and Kind of Fast with Freestyle/Freeski Influence

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

177 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Stowe, terrain park laps!

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

It skis a little short, but I like the 177 for park.

Scores

Floatation:7/10

Stability:6/10

Quickness:10/10

Playfulness:10/10

Forgiveness:9/10

Edge Grip:7/10

Versatility:8/10

Overall:9/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

I'm completing this form mostly from a park skiing perspective as I chose the Reckoner 102 while trying to do 40 tricks to celebrate my 40th birthday. While I came a bit short, I'm glad I went with the Reckoner 102. I love the flex pattern for the park. The tips and tails are nice and soft, but there's still some substance to it, so it kind of acts like suspension for my tired legs. You don't need to land perfectly, or rather if you don't land perfectly, it doesn't physically hurt as much as it can on a stiffer ski. They're also pretty light, especially in the 177 cm length, so I find them really easy to flick around.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

They're pretty versatile for a soft flexing twin tip, but I do think the park should at least be something you do relatively often if you're considering it. There are a lot of super dedicated park skiers who ski it as a daily driver park ski, and I think that's an awesome application for it.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

It's so soft and forgiving, it would be fine for an intermediate looking to get into a wider ski and/or a twin tip. Then experts will be able to do crazy things on it. Really opens up the possibilities for a skilled park skier.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

So fun!

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Jake Webber

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'11"
Weight: 215
Days / Year: 30-40
Age: 32
Years Skiing: 30

Angular

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

184 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Mashed potatoes

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

Too long, especially in the tail. I would mount less centered than recommended

Scores

Floatation:8/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:7/10

Playfulness:10/10

Forgiveness:8/10

Edge Grip:6/10

Versatility:9/10

Overall:7/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Fun, but too much tail behind me.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

Anything soft.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Intermediate and up.

If you could change anything about these skis, what would you change and why?

I would have mounted further back, but it otherwise is a joy to ski and play on.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Brad Moskowitz

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'4" with shoes
Weight: 140
Days / Year: 60-75 lift served, 25-40 Backcountry
Age: 56
Years Skiing: 52

Fun and free

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

177 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Stowe Gondi bumps, groomers, warm wet soft conditions.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

True to size for this style ski. Perfect for me!

Scores

Floatation:8/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:6/10

Playfulness:8/10

Forgiveness:8/10

Edge Grip:7/10

Versatility:7/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Soft and forgiving so I could ski with an aggressive stance but also ease up for more centered stance.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

Good for bumps, quick turns, would work in the trees and the 102 waist would probably float well in powder.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Advanced to expert.

If you could change anything about these skis, what would you change and why?

Lighter demo bindings!

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Lauren Morton

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'4"
Weight: 132
Days / Year: 30
Age: 36
Years Skiing: 30+

Lifelong skier that's up for anything!

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

162 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Soft granular

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

True

Scores

Floatation:9/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:8/10

Playfulness:9/10

Forgiveness:8/10

Edge Grip:8/10

Versatility:8/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Fun ski. Would be a good east coast powder ski. Feels floaty but transitions nicely to hard pack.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

All mountain.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Advanced and above.

If you could change anything about these skis, what would you change and why?

Nice graphics for K2.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Megan Papineau

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'1"
Weight: 120
Days / Year: 10
Age: 38
Years Skiing: 36

Former racer

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

163 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Stowe, soft granular

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

True to size

Scores

Floatation:6/10

Stability:6/10

Quickness:6/10

Playfulness:6/10

Forgiveness:6/10

Edge Grip:7/10

Versatility:6/10

Overall:6/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Felt kind of dead.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

I’m not really sure.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

I’m not sure, I don’t think I got a great feel for this ski and should probably try it again.

If you could change anything about these skis, what would you change and why?

Nothing.

Read the Full Ski Test →

Matt submitted 2 test cards — select one:

tester:

Matt Stromecki

Ability: Expert
Height: 6'2"
Weight: 195
Days / Year: 110
Age: 26
Years Skiing: 25

Smooth aggressive freeride

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

184 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Pico - Packed powder groomer, some soft snow, park laps

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

Felt fine, don't think I would rize up or down for it's intended application.

Scores

Floatation:7/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:9/10

Playfulness:9/10

Forgiveness:9/10

Edge Grip:7/10

Versatility:7/10

Overall:6/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

The Reckoner has a strange mix of characteristics that perfect suit freestyle minded skiers who want a ski that is all-mountain freeride capable but has it's roots in the park. The tips and tails are wicked soft but the underfoot zone is very supportive. There is also a good deal of torsional stiffness throughout the ski which makes it a surprisingly good carver. For me, the soft flex made them almost too reactive to input to where it demanded precision to the point where it was a little off-putting. I chalk this up to my weight as I am very easily able to flex the ski. This combinded with the minimal tip and tail taper made them extremely hooky. For lighter skiers, I can see how this would be so much fun an engaging across the mountain. For me, it is just a bit too much.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

All-mountain freestyle - evenly splitting time between the park, groomers, and trees.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Intermediate to expert.

If you could change anything about these skis, what would you change and why?

Wouldn't change anything as it is perfectly suited for a big group of skiers who are looking for a ski with these characteristics.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Bob St.Pierre

Ability: Expert
Height: 6'2"
Weight: 225
Days / Year: 100
Age: 47
Years Skiing: 37

Smooth and silent, but stiffer as of late.

Ski:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

Size Tested:

184 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Spring snow at Stowe--super fun conditions for the ski!

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

Great size. Certainly wouldn't go shorter.

Scores

Floatation:7/10

Stability:5/10

Quickness:7/10

Playfulness:10/10

Forgiveness:10/10

Edge Grip:6/10

Versatility:8/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

On paper, this is not my type of ski. On snow, I actually really like it. The Carbon Spectral Braid works great at creating engaging torsional stiffness while the softer flex in the tips and tails makes the ski super surfy and smeary. While I couldn't see myself on this ski for more than a day, it's really quite fun in that time span.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

I think the park is the best spot for this ski. If the park is soft, so much the better. It's fine and fun in trees, bumps, and groomers, but seems to be more creative than anything else. So park.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

This is a good entry level ski for intermediates looking for wider twin tips.

If you could change anything about these skis, what would you change and why?

I'd make it stiffer.

Read the Full Ski Test →

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis

GET THIS SKI WITH BINDINGS AND FREE MOUNTING:

2027 K2 Reckoner 102 Skis with Tyrolia Attack 14 GW Bindings

$908.95

Why we like it:

Who it's for:

Highlights:

Things to consider:

Fit & sizing considerations:

Reviews

Q&A

Learn more about the K2 Reckoner 102

SIMILAR PRODUCTS