All orders $50 and over get Free Ground Shipping!

Free Base Treatment
2027 Dynastar M-Pro 92 Women's Skis

2027 Dynastar M-Pro 92 Women's Skis

SKU DAPN702
$749.95
SELECT SKI SIZE

Performance UpgradesCompleted by our Expert Techs

  • • Permanent base treatment • Applied in-house by our expert technicians

  • • Base Finish Structure optimized for your region and conditions • Custom side edge and base bevel settings

2027 Dynastar M-Pro 92 Women's Skis with Tyrolia Attack LYT 11 GW BindingsGet this ski with bindings and free mounting$924.95$978.95with Tyrolia Attack LYT 11 GW Bindings
  • Free shipping
  • Free mounting
  • Earn loyalty rewards
DESCRIPTION

Built for women who like to charge, the Dynastar M-Pro W 92 brings the same H-shaped titanal frame and hybrid wood and PU core as the men's M-Pro 94 TI to a women's-specific platform. A directional shape, rocker/camber/rocker profile, and full sidewall construction give it the kind of locked-in edge feel that's rare in skis at this width, while the slightly narrower waist keeps the ski quick from edge to edge when terrain tightens up.

Why we like it:

The Titanal Rocket Frame 2.0 makes a real difference here. Most women's skis in this width drop the metal to keep the weight down, but the M-Pro W 92 keeps the laser-cut titanal in place. The result is a ski with serious damping for high-speed groomer skiing without the weight penalty of a full titanal layup.

Who it's for:

Advanced and expert women skiers who like to drive a ski hard and want real performance both on and off the groomer. Particularly well-suited to skiers transitioning from a frontside ski into a more all-mountain platform without losing carving precision. Less suited to skiers who prefer a softer, more forgiving flex pattern.

Highlights:

The M-Pro W 92 shares its construction approach with the men's M-Pro line, including the laser-cut titanal frame that places metal directly underfoot for power transfer and damping while thinning toward the tip and tail to manage swing weight. The Hybrid Core 2.0 underneath layers poplar wood in three directions with PU running along the perimeter, which keeps the ski balanced and lively rather than feeling like a heavy frontside ski. The directional shape is more conservatively tapered than the M-Free counterpart, which gives the ski more drive and authority through the back of the turn. Adaptiv Sidecut smooths the transition into and out of the carve, full-length sidewall keeps edge engagement crisp in changing snow, and the Sintered HD base offers race-quality glide. Despite the metal layer, testers consistently note that the W 92 floats better in fresh snow than its waist width would suggest.

Things to consider:

The flex is on the firmer side for a women's ski in this width range, which is a feature for advanced and expert skiers but may feel demanding for skiers still building all-mountain technique. The wider M-Pro W 98 is the natural step up for skiers who want more float.

Fit & sizing considerations:

Sizes true to length. The natural size for most skiers is whatever they normally ride, with a bump up a length making sense for skiers who push speed in chop and want extra stability.

Reviews

No reviews yet! Be the first to write a review.

Q&A

Ask a question and our experts will answer.

Learn more about the Dynastar M-Pro 92 W

Model YearProduct PageSki Test ResultsChairlift Chat
2027
2027 Dynastar M-Pro 92 Women's Skis—Skis with bindings
—
2026
—
She’s quick on and off the edge, cuts through crud reliably while carving through firm steeps confidently!
Megan Papineau
Tester Reviews
6 testers reviewed the 2027 Dynastar M-Pro 92 W
Megan submitted 2 test cards — select one:
Ability
Expert
Height
5’1”
Weight
122
Days / Year
30
Age
39
Years Skiing
36
Former racer trying to hang responsibly with Jeff
2027 Dynastar M-Pro 92 Women's Skis
Size Tested:
162 CM
Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes
Skied Stowe, Perry Merrill groomer, Hayride chunked up a bit.
Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?
True to size, I would’ve loved maybe a 167.
Scores
Floatation:6/10
 
Stability:9/10
 
Quickness:9/10
 
Playfulness:9/10
 
Forgiveness:9/10
 
Edge Grip:9/10
 
Versatility:7/10
 
Overall:8/10
 
What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?
First of all the graphics are a 10!! They’re so so pretty and fun, and while somewhat trendy they still stand out to me!
For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?
I would love this as my Stowe groomer ski! She’s quick on and off the edge, cuts through crud reliably while carving through firm steeps confidently!
What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?
I’m a former racer who loves carving on this ski; I have to imagine a recreational skier could enjoy it as well.
Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?
I think the next length up is a 170? I kinda wish there was something in between.

SIMILAR PRODUCTS