All orders $50 and over get Free Ground Shipping!

2026 Line Tom Wallisch Pro

ski test sidebar
Length157 · 164 · 171 · 178 · 185cm
Side cut
118/90/116 mm
at 178 cm length
Turn radius
19 m
at 178 cm length
Recommended terrain
Freestyle, Park, All-Mountain
Ability level
Intermediate, Expert
Rocker profile
Rocker/Camber/Rocker
Construction
Maple Macroblock, Carbon, Fatty Base & Edge, CapWall Construction, Carbon Ollieband, 5Cut Multi-Radius Sidecut, Symmetric Flex, Extruded Base

It’s always interesting getting on pro model skis because they’re just not made for everyone. Quite the opposite, in fact, as they’re really only made for one person. Such is the case with the 2026 Line Tom Wallisch Pro. This is clearly a ski that Tom designed and had Line build just for him and his ski style. Certainly, there are other skiers in the world who will find a lot in common with this ski, but probably not a ton. As a result, skis like the TW Pro aren’t in huge demand. That said, for the skier who fits this profile, there couldn’t possibly be a better ski out there than this.

Built with an aspen veneer wood core, these skis have some heft to them. Tom places a carbon ollieband in the ski to provide more support when buttering and pressing the skis. Having that extra strip of carbon goes a long way in providing feedback and energy. That said, these are pretty hefty skis as they are meant to withstand some very aggressive slopestyle skiing. The 178 sits on the scale at a stated weight of 2010 grams per ski. This also provides a more stable feel in the air, but since they’re well balanced and more symmetrical than many other park skis, it feels lighter than the weight indicates. Tester Ryan Nagle, a strong park skier, notes that there’s “Not a lot of profile. There isn’t any noticeable camber or rocker. I would stick to park. The ski doesn’t respond well enough to ski of groomer.”

The Rocker / Camber / Rocker profile of the 2026 Line Tom Wallisch Pro

In terms of shape, this ski certainly hooks into symmetry. Featuring measurements of 118/90/116, this ski doesn’t leave a lot of room for imagination—it's a park ski through and through. Those dimensions create a 19-meter turn radius in the 178 and the ski features a symmetrical rocker profile as well. This creates balance in the air and predictability throughout. This gives the skier a lot to stand on in a small space. When you’re hitting huge jumps and rails, it’s important not to have too much stuff going on down there, and Tom knows that better than most. Given this park and pro-focused model, it’s not surprising when we get feedback like this: Tester Bruce Bell, more of a directional all-mountain skier, calls it like it is, stating that the TW Pro is “One dimensional. Park with limited on-piste due to lack of edge hold.” And that’s to be expected if you’re not considering it as a pure slopestyle ski.

Like most pro models, we have to look at this ski through a certain lens. Line has a need to retain athletes on their team. They want to keep the athletes happy. One of the best ways to do that is to allow them into the ski building process and then name a ski after them. That’s exactly what you’re getting with a legend like Tom and his pro model ski.

Tester Reviews
2 testers reviewed the 2026 Line Tom Wallisch Pro
tester:
Ability
I'm A Pro
Height
5'4"
Weight
145 lbs.
Days / Year
160+
Age
19
Years Skiing
15
A slope style playfulness with a freeride base
2027 Line Tom Wallisch Pro Skis
Size Tested:
178 CM
Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes
6 pack. Slushy bumps and groomers
Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?
Just right length
Scores
Floatation:5/10
 
Stability:4/10
 
Quickness:7/10
 
Playfulness:7/10
 
Forgiveness:7/10
 
Edge Grip:4/10
 
Versatility:4/10
 
Overall:5/10
 
What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?
Not a lot of profile. There isn’t any noticeable camber or rocker.
For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?
I would stick to park. The ski doesn’t respond well enough to ski of groomer.
What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?
I would say kids and lower to mid skill level. The ski is fun and safe, but it doesn’t have the stiffness or weight to support an advanced skier.
If you could change anything about these skis, what would you change and why?
I would add more rise in the tip. More weight. And some more camber.

Explore More

LEAVE A REPLY
Loading Form...